Development and Comparative Evaluation of Two Antigen Detection Tests for Visceral Leishmaniasis
Development and Comparative Evaluation of Two Antigen Detection Tests for Visceral Leishmaniasis
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015-11-15
Authors
Mukhtar, Moawia M.
Vallu, Aarthy C.
Ahmed, Abdalla E.
Abdoun, Asim O.
etal
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
UOFK
Abstract
Background:
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) can be fatal without timely diagnosis and treatment. Treatment efficacies
vary due to drug resistance, drug toxicity and co-morbidities. It is important to monitor treatment responsiveness to
confirm cure and curtail relapse. Currently, microscopy of spleen, bone marrow or lymph node biopsies is the only
definitive method to evaluate cure. A less invasive test for treatment success is a high priority for VL management.
Methods:
In this study, we describe the development of a capture ELISA based on detecting
Leishmania donovani
antigens in urine samples and comparison with the
Leishmania
Antigen ELISA, also developed for the same purpose.
Both were developed as prototype kits and tested on patient urine samples from Sudan, Ethiopia, Bangladesh and
Brazil, along with appropriate control samples from endemic and non-endemic regions. Sensitivity and specificity were
assessed based on accurate detection of patients compared to control samples. One- Way ANOVA was used to assess
the discrimination capacity of the tests and Cohen
’
s kappa was used to assess their correlation.
Results:
The
Leishmania
Antigen Detect
™
ELISA demonstrated >90 % sensitivity on VL patient samples from Sudan,
Bangladesh and Ethiopia and 88 % on samples from Brazil. The
Leishmania
Antigen ELISA was comparable in
performance except for lower sensitivity on Sudanese samples. Both were highly specific. To confirm utility in
monitoring treatment, urine samples were collected f
rom VL patients at days 0, 30 and 180 post- treatment. For
the
Leishmania
Antigen Detect
™
ELISA, positivity was high at day 0 at 95 %, falling to 21 % at day 30. At day 180, all
samples were negative, corresponding well with clinical cure. A similar trend was also seen for the
Leishmania
Antigen
ELISA albeit; with lower positivity of 91 % at Day 0 and more patients, remaining positive at Days 30 and 180.
Discussion:
The
Leishmania
Antigen Detect
™
and the
Leishmania
Antigen ELISAs are standardized, user- friendly,
quantitative and direct tests to detect
Leishmania
during acute VL as well as to monitor parasite clearance during
treatment. They are a clear improvement over existing options.
Conclusion:
The ELISAs provide a non-invasive method to detect pa
rasite antigens during acute infection and monitor
its clearance upon cure, filling an unmet need in VL management. Further refinement of the tests with more samples
from endemic regions will define their utility in monitoring treatment
Description
Keywords
Diagnosis,
Leishmania,
Antigen,
Treatment,
Antibody,
Kala aza,
Infectio