dc.description.abstract |
In an open, randomized, clinical trial, conducted in New Halfa, eastern Sudan in September–October 2004, the
efficacies and adverse effects of artesunate plus sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP), in the treatment of
uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria, were compared with those of SP alone. Patients were randomized
to receive either artesunate (4 mg/kg.day) on days 0–2 plus SP (25 mg sulfadoxine/kg) on day 0 or the SP alone,
and then followed-up for 28 days. Sixty patients completed follow-up. Compared with the 30 given artesunate plus
SP (ASP), the 30 given SP alone were much more likely to be febrile (30% v. 3.3%; P50.006) and parasitaemic
(50% v. 6.7%; P,00001) on day 1. By day 3, 16.7% of the patients given SP alone were still febrile and 6.7% of
them were still parasitaemic, although all the patients given ASP were then afebrile (P50.02) and aparasitaemic
(P50.1). Five (16.7%) of the patients treated with SP alone but none of those given ASP appeared to be treatment
failures (P,0.05). Parasite genotyping revealed that four of the five apparent treatment failures were true
recrudescences but the other represented a re-infection detected on day 28. The true frequencies of cure by day 28
were therefore 100% for ASP and 86.7% for SP alone (P50.02).
Adverse effects of treatment (nausea, itching and giddiness) were observed with similar frequencies in the two
treatment arms (10.0% of the patients given ASP v. 13.3% of the patients given SP alone; P.0.05). The
frequencies of gametocytaemia during follow-up were, however, much lower in the ASP arm than in the SP-only
(0.0% v. 23.3%; P50.005).
Thus, although the problems posed by adverse effects were similar in the two treatment arms, ASP appeared
markedly better, in terms of fever- and parasite-clearance times and the prevalence of post-treatment
gametocytaemia, than SP alone. |
en_US |