Absorption Profile And
Bioequivalence Of Two Locally
Manufactured Cephalexins
Absorption Profile And
Bioequivalence Of Two Locally
Manufactured Cephalexins
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015-04-06
Authors
Elawad,Zuheir Abdelrahman
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Khartoum
Abstract
The disposition of three locally manufactured oral Cephalexins
(two capsules and a suspension) was assessed by estimation of the
pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability metrics of their
constituent (Cephalexin monohydrate), in healthy subjects in comparison
with the innovator's brand (Keflex
®
). The study was carried out at the
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of
Khartoum. Ten healthy adult volunteers were included in the study
following fulfillment of itsinclusion and exclusion criteria. A randomized
three-way and two-way cross over design was performed. Blood samples
were collected at specified time after medication with a single dose of
cephalexin (2 capsules or 10 ml suspension).
Concentrations of cephalexin were measured in plasma by HPLC
method using cefotaxim as an internal standard. Non-compartmental
pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on the plasma concentrationtime data.
The pharmacokinetic parameters(Mean ± SD) of cephalexin
following administration of keflex
®
capsules, capsules B and capsules C
were estimated as Tmax1.10 ± 0.29h, 1.15 ± 0.32h and 1.15 ± 0.32h,
Cpmax25.56 ± 6.72µg/ml, 23.95 ± 11.09µg/ml and 13.17 ± 6.97 µg/ml,
AUC 45.39 ± 14.94µg.h/ml, 53.48 ± 19.58µg.h/ml and 23.26 ± 12.31
µg.h/ml, MRT 1.99 ± 0.3h, 2.44 ± 0.65h and 1.97 ± 0.3h, Ke 0.709 ± 0.11
h
-1
, 0.65 ± 0.14 h
-1
and 0.732 ± 0.128 h
-1
. t½1.0 ± 0.18 h, 1.11 ±0.22 h
and 0.97 ± 0.15 h. CL/F 23.86 ± 6.4 L/h, 21.36 ± 8.56 L/h and 29.59 ±
20.98 L/h. Vd/F 33.87 ± 9.18 L, 35.48 ± 20.22 L and 42.51 ± 35.73 L.
The pharmacokinetic parameters (Mean ±SD) of Keflex®
suspension and suspension E are in the following order Tmax0.84 ± 0.35 h
and 0.90± 0.17 h, Cpmax38.32 ± 4.74 µg/ml and 35.51 ± 11.52 µg/ml,
iii
AUC∞52.67 ± 10.12µg.h/ml and 54.17 ± 11.52µg/ml, MRT 1.53 ± 0.2h
and 1.56 ± 0.19h, Ke 0.87 ± 0.09 h
-1
and 0.9 ± 0.08h
-1
, T½ 0.81 ± 0.08 h
and 0.78 ± 0.07h, CL/F 17.99 ± 3.46 L/h and 21.41 ± 9.88 L/h, Vd/F
20.82 ± 3.7 L and 23.94 ± 10.79 L.
Statistical analysis using student'st-test showed that there are no
statistically significant differences in all pharmacokinetic parameters
between locally manufactured capsules B an C comparedto capsules A
(Keflex
®
capsules) and suspension E from the local industry compared to
reference suspension D (Keflex
®
suspension).
The relative bioavailability ofcapsules B and capsules C in
comparison with the standard brand Keflex
®
capsules were 117. . 8 % and
102.48.%, respectively. On the other hand the relative bioavailability of
suspension E in comparison with Keflex
®
suspension was 102.84%.
The study concluded that the absorption profiles and disposition
patterns of the locally produced test formulations is highly comparable
with that of the standard brands. The tested generics are equally
dispositional as the standard brands and gave same plasma level. It is
expected that locally manufactured brands will achieve same clinical
efficacy as that of the innovator’s brand. Consequently they can be
considered bioequivalent with the standard brands and accordingly can be
used interchangeably.
Description
164 Pages
Keywords
Bioequivalence,classification,bacterial infection,Contraindications,bioavailability,Analytical procedure,Clinical protocol,
Linearity ,Sensitivity,Selectivit ,Precision ,accuracy,
Locally