الفقهاء والسلطة في المغرب
الفقهاء والسلطة في المغرب
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015-05-18
Authors
محمود عثمان, عصام
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
UOFK
Abstract
This study discusses the relationship between the jurists
and the state in Morocco from 558 – 184 A.H. (800 – 1163
A.D.). The study consists of four chapters. It begins with a
review of the most important references and ends with the
significant findings.
The study reviews how the jurist transforms from a
religious teacher to a religious reformer who seeks to educate
his followers according to a certain methodology. In the
meantime he seeks to possess military power so as to impose
his religious doctrines and by extension the power of the state.
The relationship between the jurists and the political
authorities significantly developed in medieval Morocco. It had
its impact on the religious and political life of the medieval
Morocco, marked the country with special characteristics, as
distinguished from other countries. It revealed a strong
association between religion and state to the extent that we can
not find a state, which was not affiliated to one sect or another.
The Malikia jurists during the era of the Independent
States relied upon a political authority from outside the
intellectual and political system. Therefore, their alliance with
the princes was a temporary and a short one, prompted by
certain circumstances. Besides, the jurist was not involved in
coronation of the princes, so, in most cases he was subject to
persecution and harassment of the prince.
Under the legitimized jurisprudence of the allied jurists to
the ruling authorities, the opposing jurists were subject to all
kinds of punishment lashing, defamation, expulsion, and
assassination.
On the other hand, the prince during his first days in office
needs support and loyalty of the jurist. But he will not tolerate
criticism and legal challenges to his authority.
The character of the jurist developed in Arabian Morocco
in the second phase after the appearance of the jurist as a
reformer who used to educate his followers in such away that
might unify them and bring them close to his altitude and
religious philosophy. This resulted in absolute obedience of his
followers. Then a transformation from the stage of the
assimilation of ideas and teachings to the phase of the state. To
foster and impose his reformist philosophy through which he
defines religion doctrines, the jurist excludes and regards others
as a deviation that needs reform.
The jurist’s method in pursuing his goals was different. He
used to adopt a distinctive methodology to educate his followers
.
The era of Morabiteen and Mowahideen witnessed
considerable development in the relationship between jurists and
the ruling authorities. The state was structured upon the alliance
of the reformist jurist and tribal chief or prince, in which the
jurist was regarded as the legislative religious authority and the
prince as the military one.
The Maliki jurists of the Morabiteen era constituted an
influential body particularly in outlining the intellectual and
philosophical sphere of the state. They approved what they saw
valid and good, censored and burnt all the scientific writings
which could have challenged their political status.
Al Mahadi Ben Tomert was different in his reformist
methodology from his predecessors since he followed a new
doctrine in his teaching and philosophy that concentrated on the
concept of "Tawheed" doctrine. Moreover, he claimed Mahdism
and perfectibility. He crowned himself as a fanatical ruler and
imposed reformist doctrines. In his doctrines he relied upon
theological and ideological discourse, which he indorsed as his
theoretical background to legitimize his policies as well as to
reform religion.
The rise of Mowahideen state upon Al Mahdi Ben Tomert
doctrines represented the peak of the relationship between the
jurists and the political authority. The jurist was not only a
religious reference for the state but also an organizer of the
military forces which were formed from his followers.
Moreover, he chose the military commander who led forces in
war. This methodology was adopted so as to foster and impose
the Caliphs’ reformist doctrines.